Risk evaluation of fetal growth restriction by combined screening in early and mid-pregnancy

Bo Wang; Chunhua Zhang

doi:10.12669/pjms.36.7.1988

Bo Wang Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Chunhua Zhang Department of Gynecology, Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.1988

Keywords: Early pregnancy, Mid-pregnancy, Fetal growth restriction

Abstract

Objectives: To assess risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR) by combined screening in early and mid-pregnancy.

Methods: Pregnant women who received prenatal examinations and delivered in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2019 were selected and retrospectively analyzed. All women completed two ultrasonographic examinations during pregnancy, i.e. Down’s screening during early pregnancy (11-13 + 6 weeks) and prenatal color Doppler screening during mid-pregnancy (20-24 weeks). A total of 33 FGR cases were screened out, and there were 1,507 normal pregnant women. The clinical, ultrasonographic and serological indices in early and mid-pregnancy were recorded. When the false positive rate was 5%, logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the influencing factors and predictive values of individual and combined indices for FGR in corresponding gestational weeks. The sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cutoff value of each index as well as the combination of optimal predictive indices were found by the area under ROC curve (AUC).

Results: When the false positive rate was 5% in the single-index screening during early pregnancy, the parity, BPD, AC, HC, and FL had statistical significances. Multivariate analysis showed that the parity and BPD had statistical significances. During mid-pregnancy, univariate analysis revealed that the parity, BMI, BPD, AC, HC, FL, UTA-PI, UTA-RI, UA-PI and UA-RI had statistical significances. BMI, AC, UTA-PI, UTA-RI, UA-PI and UA-RI had statistical significances in multivariate analysis. BMI, UTA-PI and UA-PI were risk factors for FGR, with UTA-PI being most dangerous. AUC for combined screening exceeded those for individual screenings. The best combined screening program was BPD in early pregnancy + BMI + AC + UTA-PI + UTA-RI + UA-PI + UA-RI in mid-pregnancy. The optimal cutoff value was 0.015, with the sensitivity of 83.1% and the specificity of 61.3%.

Conclusion: The predictive efficiency of combined FGR screening in early and mid-pregnancy surpasses that of simple mid-pregnancy screening. It is recommended to use the integrated screening program in early and mid-pregnancy to predict FGR.

doi: https://doi.org/-10.12669/pjms.36.7.1988

How to cite this:
Wang B, Zhang C. Risk evaluation of fetal growth restriction by combined screening in early and mid-pregnancy. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(7):1708-1713. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.1988

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.